🔗 Share this article

Iran is ready to restart atomic talks with the United States provided that it is treated with "respect" and "honor", Iran's foreign minister has declared.

Abbas Araghchi said exclusively dialogue produced results, and shared new appeals had come from intermediaries to resume talks with the US government. He claimed Iran did not have secret atomic facilities, and Iran had not yet reached a point to permit the global atomic watchdog to inspect attacked atomic facilities for protective measures.

Navigating a Difficult Course

Araghchi is navigating a difficult course since Iran does not want be seen to be acting from a situation of disadvantage, and he emphatically stated that Iran had emerged more resilient militarily and emotionally from the Israeli-US attack on its enrichment centers in June.

He was talking at a strategic meeting in Tehran where he reaffirmed that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to process nuclear material on home soil that it will perpetually retain" – the main reason of the impasse in the earlier negotiations.

Earlier Negotiations Abruptly Ended

The previous five rounds of discussions between the United States and Iran were brought to an abrupt and bitter end on 12 June when the Israeli government, with US support, targeted Iran's enrichment centers in a fortnight-long engagement that ended with Donald Trump asserting the locations had been eliminated. Subsequently, Western states exercised their privilege to reimpose UN-wide sanctions, but Iran asserts they have not had a substantial consequence.

Perfect Agreement Offered

Iranian officials said they felt they had attained a "perfect agreement" to the uranium processing matter in previous talks, when it was agreed an Iran-based consortium with American involvement could enrich uranium. Both sides would have been able to claim victory since domestic enrichment would have persisted and the US could be assured that Iran's enrichment initiative was solely for peaceful purposes.

It had not been decided in the talks that American atomic experts could operate within Iranian territory, but that was a reasonable assumption of the partnership suggestion. Representatives stated three times they had secured an understanding with the US representative the American negotiator only for the deal to collapse due to "detractors in America".

Current Position

Iranian officials declared the consortium offer was now no longer available, but it seems highly likely the offer could be reintroduced in some form if discussions reopen.

The US president last week claimed he had been receiving messages that Iran sought to reopen negotiations, but in private Tehran representatives state they are not yet getting clear proposals from America either straightforwardly or from key regional mediators, such as Qatar, Egypt, the Omani authorities and the Saudi kingdom. The Iran's state department has been accused of inactivity in the wake of Trump's direct instinctive approach, but Tehran asserts diplomacy is not part of a performance.

Political Stance

In his address to the gathering, designed to depict the US as a dominant force that exploits the idea of international law, the foreign minister declared the two-week conflict demonstrated the dispute could not be settled by combat operations. He stated the strikes began with a Washington's ultimatum for an complete Tehran capitulation and concluded with an complete request for a halt to hostilities.

Iran is certain the initial Israeli attacks were carried out with complete American awareness and cooperation, making faith difficult to rebuild.

Negotiations Continues the Primary Solution

The foreign minister stated: "Tehran was not the one that had deserted negotiations; it was America and the Western nations that had consistently attempted to dictate their will during the negotiations. Negotiations can still be viable and continues the final answer to settle disagreements, but its standards, guidelines and principles must be respected."

"In case they talk to the nation of Iran with the approach of respect and honor, they will get a response in the identical tone."

Restoration and Reconstruction

In what is portrayed by Tehran representatives as the battle of repair and reconstruction, the foreign minister claimed he was certain Iran's military capacities "are much stronger than prior to 13 or 14 June of this year. Our entire military infrastructure have been rebuilt. We gained multiple understandings from this conflict; we have discovered our internal vulnerabilities and the vulnerabilities of the adversary."

He continued: "We effectively endured this engagement. Our enrichment knowledge, which they aimed to destroy, remains in place. The installations and gear, if damaged, will be rebuilt; what is important is the determination of the Iranian people and then the social solidarity that they sought to undermine, but did not succeed to shatter. The nation of Iran have become more resilient, more cohesive, and more endorsing of the government and the country in the face of this attack."